Chúng tôi khẳng định một chân lý hiển nhiên rằng mọi người sinh ra đều bình đẳng, rằng tạo hóa đã ban cho họ những quyền tất yếu và bất khả xâm phạm, trong đó có quyền sống, quyền được tự do và mưu cầu hạnh phúc . . . (Lời Mở Đầu Của Tuyên Ngôn Độc Lập Mỹ)
Thursday, November 8, 2018
Trung Quốc dùng chip nhỏ bằng hạt gạo để xâm nhập các công ty Mỹ
Cuộc tấn công của gián điệp Trung Quốc nhắm vào gần 30 công ty Mỹ, bao gồm cả những thương hiệu hàng đầu như Amazon và Apple.
Trong 2015, Amazon âm thầm đánh giá một dự án khởi nghiệp có tên Elemental Technologies, tiềm năng giúp công ty mở rộng dịch vụ streaming video. Startup này tạo ra chương trình phần mềm để nén các video lớn, với định dạng có thể dùng trên nhiều thiết bị khác nhau. Công nghệ đó đã giúp truyền trực tuyến Thế vận hội Olympic, giao tiếp với trạm Vũ trụ Quốc tế (ISS) hay truyền các hình ảnh từ máy bay không người lái đến Cơ quan Tình báo Trung ương Mỹ (CIA). Ngoài những hợp đồng an ninh quốc gia của Elemental, Amazon còn thấy nhiều mặt lợi khi mua lại startup này, trong đó giúp ích cho dự án Amazon Web Services mà họ đang xây dựng cho CIA.
Chip gián điệp được phát hiện thế nào
Để giúp thẩm định, Amazon đã thuê một công ty thứ ba để xem xét tình hình an ninh của Elemental, nguồn tin cho Bloomberg biết. Sau khi vượt qua những kiểm tra đầu tiên, Amazon tiếp tục xem xét kỹ hơn các sản phẩm chính của Elemental, đó là các máy chủ (server) mà khách hàng của Elemental đặt trong hệ thống mạng của họ để nén video. Các server này được lắp ráp bởi Super Micro Computer (Supermicro), một công ty có trụ sở ở San Jose (Mỹ) và là một trong những nhà cung cấp bo mạch chủ máy chủ lớn nhất thế giới. Vào cuối 2015, nhân viên của Elemental đã đóng gói một số máy chủ và gửi chúng tới Ontario (Canada) để công ty bảo mật thứ ba kiểm tra.
Trên bo mạch server, các chuyên gia phát hiện một vi mạch nhỏ xíu, chỉ hơn một hạt gạo và đáng nói là chi tiết này không nằm trong thiết kế ban đầu của nhà sản xuất. Amazon báo cáo vấn đề trên với chính phủ Mỹ, đưa thông tin tới cộng đồng tình báo. Các máy chủ của Elemental được dùng tại các trung tâm dữ liệu của Bộ Quốc phòng Mỹ, hoạt động bay không người lái của CIA hay mạng lưới tàu chiến của Hải quân Mỹ. Hơn nữa, Elemental chỉ là một trong hàng trăm khách hàng của Supermicro.
Trong cuộc thăm dò kéo dài hơn ba năm sau, các nhà điều tra xác định rằng các chip trên cho phép kẻ tấn công tạo ra một "cánh cửa tàng hình" (backdoor) vào bất kỳ hệ thống mạng nào có lắp đặt máy chủ trên. Nguồn tin cho biết các nhà điều tra phát hiện các chip trên đã được đưa vào các nhà máy đối tác ở Trung Quốc điều hành.
Cuộc tấn công trên nghiêm trọng hơn các sự cố về phần mềm vốn dần trở nên quen thuộc. Hack phần cứng khó hơn nhưng khả năng để lại hậu quả nặng nề hơn, sức "tàn phá" nghiêm trọng hơn và tạo được vỏ bọc "tàng hình". Nó cũng cho thấy các cơ quan gián điệp sẵn sàng đầu tư hàng triệu USD để đạt được mục đích này.
Các nhà điều tra Mỹ phát hiện chip trên đã được đưa vào quá trình sản xuất, bởi một đơn vị cung ứng thuộc quân đội Trung Quốc. Với Supermicro, gián điệp Trung Quốc dường như đã tìm thấy "một lối nhỏ hoàn hảo" để thực hiện cuộc tấn công. Dĩ nhiên để thực hiện thì gián điệp phải hiểu biết tường tận về thiết kế của sản phẩm, các thao tác trong quá trình sản xuất tại nhà máy và phải đảm bảo rằng thiết bị sẽ vượt qua các chuỗi vận chuyển để tới nơi mong muốn.
Một quan chức cho biết các nhà điều tra phát hiện có gần 30 công ty Mỹ bị ảnh hưởng, bao gồm một ngân hàng lớn, các nhà thầu của chính phủ Mỹ và công ty có giá trị nhất thế giới. Apple cũng là một khách hàng quan trọng của Supermicro và đã lên kế hoạch đặt hàng hơn 30.000 máy chủ cho mạng lưới trung tâm dữ liệu toàn cầu mới. Ba nhân viên cấp cao tại Apple nói rằng công ty đã phát hiện những chip độc hại trên bo mạch chủ của Supermicro vào giữa 2015. Apple cắt đứt quan hệ với Supermicro một năm sau đó.
Trong báo cáo gửi qua email, Amazon, Apple và Supermicro đã phản đối thông tin của Bloomberg. Amazon nói họ không biết về "vấn đề với chip độc hại hay phần cứng bị can thiệp khi mua Elemental", còn Apple tuyên bố "chưa bao giờ tìm thấy chip độc hại hay những lỗ hổng hữu ý trong bất kỳ máy chủ nào". Phát ngôn viên của Supermicro thì nói: "Chúng tôi không biết bất cứ điều gì về cuộc điều tra như vậy".
Tuy nhiên các tuyên bố từ ba công ty trên đã bị phản bác bởi sáu quan chức an ninh quốc gia cấp cao Mỹ. Một trong những quan chức trên cùng hai người của Amazon đã cung cấp nhiều thông tin về cách thức tấn công diễn ra tại Elemental và Amazon. Ba người của Apple cùng bốn quan chức khác xác nhận Apple là một trong những nạn nhân của cuộc tấn công. Ngoài ra có 17 người xác nhận phần cứng của Supermicro gặp vấn đề.
Chip gián điệp hoạt động ra sao
Các chip gián điệp được thiết kế tương tự các thành phần linh kiện trên bo mạch chủ và sẽ không thể phát hiện nếu không dùng những thiết bị chuyên dụng. Tùy thuộc vào sản phẩm gốc, các chip này được điều chỉnh lại kích thước và qua đó cho thấy những kẻ tấn công đã thực hiện điều này tại các nhà máy khác nhau, trên các lô hàng khác nhau.
Khi cắm được chip lên bo mạch chủ, nó sẽ điều hướng luồng dữ liệu trên đây, từ đó cho phép server có khả năng giao tiếp với máy tính từ xa qua kết nối Internet để tải về những câu lệnh phức tạp và chuẩn bị để server chấp nhận các code mới này. Có thể hiểu với cách ấy, kẻ tấn công có thể thay đổi hoàn toàn cách hoạt động của thiết bị. "Phần cứng sẽ mở bất kỳ cánh cửa nào mà nó mong muốn", chuyên gia Joe FitzPatrick nói.
Kế hoạch cài cắm đầy tính toán
Supermicro được thành lập bởi Charles Liang, một kỹ sư Đài Loan từng học đại học ở Texas (Mỹ), cùng vợ của mình vào năm 1993. Các bo mạch chủ của Supermicro được dùng trên các máy tính đặc biệt như máy chụp cộng hưởng từ MRI đến các hệ thống vũ khí. Nó cũng dùng trên máy chủ dành cho ngân hàng, các quỹ phòng hộ, nhà cung cấp điện toán đám mây… Ngày nay, Supermicro bán được nhiều bo mạch chủ server hơn bất kỳ công ty nào và thống lĩnh thị trường tỷ USD này. Công ty có các cơ sở lắp ráp ở Mỹ, Hà Lan và Đài Loan, nhưng bo mạch chủ - sản phẩm cốt lõi của họ - gần như được sản xuất toàn bộ bởi đối tác Trung Quốc.
Phần lớn lao động của Supermicro ở Mỹ nói tiếng Đài Loan hay tiếng Trung Quốc và điều này giúp gián điệp nắm rõ hơn hoạt động của công ty, từ đó xâm nhập. Với hơn 900 khách hàng ở 100 quốc gia, Supermicro là cánh cửa nhạy cảm để xâm nhập vào hàng loạt mục tiêu. “Có thể coi Supermicro là Microsoft của thế giới phần cứng”, một quan chức tình báo Mỹ từng nghiên cứu về Supermicro nói. “Tấn công vào bo mạch chủ của Supermicro giống như tấn công vào Windows và cũng là tấn công toàn thế giới.
Supermicro có ba nhà máy sản xuất chính, hai ở Đài Loan và một tại Thượng Hải. Khi ngập trong đơn hàng, công ty sẽ phải thuê đối tác bên ngoài và đây chính là kẽ hở để cài cắm chip gián điệp. Những người đứng sau sẵn sàng lọc thông tin thông qua việc kiểm duyệt truyền thông, thậm chí theo dõi điện thoại của các cá nhân chủ chốt. Sau đó các quản lý của nhà máy đã nhận hối lộ để chấp nhận đưa thêm chip gián điệp vào dây chuyền sản xuất. Nếu không đạt được mục đích, họ sẽ chuyển sang đe dọa có thể đóng cửa nhà máy.
Các nhà điều tra kết luận rằng kế hoạch phức tạp trên được vạch ra bởi một đơn vị quân đội Trung Quốc chuyên về các cuộc tấn công phần cứng. Đội này được cho là chuyên tập trung vào các mục tiêu quan trọng như công nghệ, thương mại và máy tính của quân đội đối thủ. Trong những cuộc tấn công trước đây, đơn vị này đã nhắm vào các thiết kế cho máy tính hiệu suất cao và máy tính cho các nhà cung cấp dịch vụ Internet lớn ở Mỹ.
Apple, Amazon là nạn nhân
Trong 2014, Apple lên kế hoạch đặt hàng hơn 6.000 máy chủ Supermicro để lắp đặt tại 17 địa điểm ở Amsterdam (Hà Lan), Hong Kong, Los Angeles, Chicago, New York, San Jose (Mỹ), Singapore và Tokyo (Nhật Bản); cùng với 4.000 máy chủ cho các trung tâm dữ liệu hiện có ở Bắc Carolina và Oregon (Mỹ). Đơn hàng được cho là tăng gấp đôi trong 2015, đưa Apple trở thành một khách hàng quan trọng của Supermicro, vào đúng giai đoạn phần cứng của công ty này bị cài cắm chip gián điệp.
Sau khi lắp được 7.000 máy chủ, dự án bị chậm lại do phát hiện vấn đề về hiệu năng. Apple không cung cấp thông tin này cho các nhà điều tra thuộc chính phủ. Thay vào đó, đến 2015, khi phát hiện chip độc hại, Apple đã loại bỏ tất cả máy chủ Supermicro khỏi hệ thống của công ty. Trong 2016, hãng tuyên bố cắt đứt mối quan hệ với Supermicro.
Còn với Amazon, công ty tuyên bố mua lại Elemental vào 9/2015. Nhiều nguồn tin nói rằng giá trị bản hợp đồng này là 350 triệu USD và Amazon dự định chuyển phần mềm của Elemental sang các máy chủ đám mây của công ty mà những hệ thống này dùng chip, bo mạch chủ và các thành phần quan trọng khác được thiết kế riêng và sản xuất bởi các nhà máy mà Amazon ký hợp đồng trực tiếp.
Có một ngoại lệ là trung tâm dữ liệu của Amazon ở Trung Quốc dùng máy chủ Supermicro. Các điều tra của công ty đã phát hiện máy chủ ở Bắc Kinh cũng dính chip gián điệp nhưng được thiết kế tinh vi hơn. Thậm chí nó đủ mỏng để “nhúng” giữa các lớp mạch và nhỏ hơn cả đầu bút chì nhọn.
Một quan chức chính phủ Mỹ cho biết mục tiêu của Trung Quốc là tiếp cận lâu dài với các bí mật của những công ty có giá trị cao cùng các mạng lưới nhạy cảm của chính phủ. Không có bất cứ dữ liệu của người dùng nào bị đánh cắp, báo cáo cho biết.
Các cuộc tấn công dạng trên vẫn tiếp tục diễn ra. Chính quyền tổng thống Donald Trump đã áp dụng các lệnh trừng phạt kinh tế với Trung Quốc, trong đó tập trung vào phần cứng máy tính và thiết bị mạng, bao gồm cả bo mạch máy chủ. Các quan chức Nhà Trắng nói rằng các công ty Mỹ sẽ bắt đầu chuyển chuỗi cung ứng của họ sang các nước khác.
The Big Hack: How China Used a Tiny Chip to Infiltrate U.S. Companies
The attack by Chinese spies reached almost 30 U.S. companies, including Amazon and Apple, by compromising America’s technology supply chain, according to extensive interviews with government and corporate sources.
ILLUSTRATOR: SCOTT GELBER FOR BLOOMBERG BUSINESSWEEK
By
Jordan Robertson
and
Michael Riley
In 2015, Amazon.com Inc. began quietly evaluating a startup called Elemental Technologies, a potential acquisition to help with a major expansion of its streaming video service, known today as Amazon Prime Video. Based in Portland, Ore., Elemental made software for compressing massive video files and formatting them for different devices. Its technology had helped stream the Olympic Games online, communicate with the International Space Station, and funnel drone footage to the Central Intelligence Agency. Elemental’s national security contracts weren’t the main reason for the proposed acquisition, but they fit nicely with Amazon’s government businesses, such as the highly secure cloud that Amazon Web Services (AWS) was building for the CIA.
To help with due diligence, AWS, which was overseeing the prospective acquisition, hired a third-party company to scrutinize Elemental’s security, according to one person familiar with the process. The first pass uncovered troubling issues, prompting AWS to take a closer look at Elemental’s main product: the expensive servers that customers installed in their networks to handle the video compression. These servers were assembled for Elemental by Super Micro Computer Inc., a San Jose-based company (commonly known as Supermicro) that’s also one of the world’s biggest suppliers of server motherboards, the fiberglass-mounted clusters of chips and capacitors that act as the neurons of data centers large and small. In late spring of 2015, Elemental’s staff boxed up several servers and sent them to Ontario, Canada, for the third-party security company to test, the person says.
Featured in Bloomberg Businessweek, Oct. 8, 2018. Subscribe now.
PHOTOGRAPHER: VICTOR PRADO FOR BLOOMBERG BUSINESSWEEK
Nested on the servers’ motherboards, the testers found a tiny microchip, not much bigger than a grain of rice, that wasn’t part of the boards’ original design. Amazon reported the discovery to U.S. authorities, sending a shudder through the intelligence community. Elemental’s servers could be found in Department of Defense data centers, the CIA’s drone operations, and the onboard networks of Navy warships. And Elemental was just one of hundreds of Supermicro customers.
During the ensuing top-secret probe, which remains open more than three years later, investigators determined that the chips allowed the attackers to create a stealth doorway into any network that included the altered machines. Multiple people familiar with the matter say investigators found that the chips had been inserted at factories run by manufacturing subcontractors in China.
This attack was something graver than the software-based incidents the world has grown accustomed to seeing. Hardware hacks are more difficult to pull off and potentially more devastating, promising the kind of long-term, stealth access that spy agencies are willing to invest millions of dollars and many years to get.
There are two ways for spies to alter the guts of computer equipment. One, known as interdiction, consists of manipulating devices as they’re in transit from manufacturer to customer. This approach is favored by U.S. spy agencies, according to documents leaked by former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden. The other method involves seeding changes from the very beginning.
One country in particular has an advantage executing this kind of attack: China, which by some estimates makes 75 percent of the world’s mobile phones and 90 percent of its PCs. Still, to actually accomplish a seeding attack would mean developing a deep understanding of a product’s design, manipulating components at the factory, and ensuring that the doctored devices made it through the global logistics chain to the desired location—a feat akin to throwing a stick in the Yangtze River upstream from Shanghai and ensuring that it washes ashore in Seattle. “Having a well-done, nation-state-level hardware implant surface would be like witnessing a unicorn jumping over a rainbow,” says Joe Grand, a hardware hacker and the founder of Grand Idea Studio Inc. “Hardware is just so far off the radar, it’s almost treated like black magic.”
But that’s just what U.S. investigators found: The chips had been inserted during the manufacturing process, two officials say, by operatives from a unit of the People’s Liberation Army. In Supermicro, China’s spies appear to have found a perfect conduit for what U.S. officials now describe as the most significant supply chain attack known to have been carried out against American companies.
One official says investigators found that it eventually affected almost 30 companies, including a major bank, government contractors, and the world’s most valuable company, Apple Inc. Apple was an important Supermicro customer and had planned to order more than 30,000 of its servers in two years for a new global network of data centers. Three senior insiders at Apple say that in the summer of 2015, it, too, found malicious chips on Supermicro motherboards. Apple severed ties with Supermicro the following year, for what it described as unrelated reasons.
In emailed statements, Amazon (which announced its acquisition of Elemental in September 2015), Apple, and Supermicro disputed summaries of Bloomberg Businessweek’s reporting. “It’s untrue that AWS knew about a supply chain compromise, an issue with malicious chips, or hardware modifications when acquiring Elemental,” Amazon wrote. “On this we can be very clear: Apple has never found malicious chips, ‘hardware manipulations’ or vulnerabilities purposely planted in any server,” Apple wrote. “We remain unaware of any such investigation,” wrote a spokesman for Supermicro, Perry Hayes. The Chinese government didn’t directly address questions about manipulation of Supermicro servers, issuing a statement that read, in part, “Supply chain safety in cyberspace is an issue of common concern, and China is also a victim.” The FBI and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, representing the CIA and NSA, declined to comment.
The companies’ denials are countered by six current and former senior national security officials, who—in conversations that began during the Obama administration and continued under the Trump administration—detailed the discovery of the chips and the government’s investigation. One of those officials and two people inside AWS provided extensive information on how the attack played out at Elemental and Amazon; the official and one of the insiders also described Amazon’s cooperation with the government investigation. In addition to the three Apple insiders, four of the six U.S. officials confirmed that Apple was a victim. In all, 17 people confirmed the manipulation of Supermicro’s hardware and other elements of the attacks. The sources were granted anonymity because of the sensitive, and in some cases classified, nature of the information.
One government official says China’s goal was long-term access to high-value corporate secrets and sensitive government networks. No consumer data is known to have been stolen.
The ramifications of the attack continue to play out. The Trump administration has made computer and networking hardware, including motherboards, a focus of its latest round of trade sanctions against China, and White House officials have made it clear they think companies will begin shifting their supply chains to other countries as a result. Such a shift might assuage officials who have been warning for years about the security of the supply chain—even though they’ve never disclosed a major reason for their concerns.
Back in 2006, three engineers in Oregon had a clever idea. Demand for mobile video was about to explode, and they predicted that broadcasters would be desperate to transform programs designed to fit TV screens into the various formats needed for viewing on smartphones, laptops, and other devices. To meet the anticipated demand, the engineers started Elemental Technologies, assembling what one former adviser to the company calls a genius team to write code that would adapt the superfast graphics chips being produced for high-end video-gaming machines. The resulting software dramatically reduced the time it took to process large video files. Elemental then loaded the software onto custom-built servers emblazoned with its leprechaun-green logos.
Elemental servers sold for as much as $100,000 each, at profit margins of as high as 70 percent, according to a former adviser to the company. Two of Elemental’s biggest early clients were the Mormon church, which used the technology to beam sermons to congregations around the world, and the adult film industry, which did not.
Elemental also started working with American spy agencies. In 2009 the company announced a development partnership with In-Q-Tel Inc., the CIA’s investment arm, a deal that paved the way for Elemental servers to be used in national security missions across the U.S. government. Public documents, including the company’s own promotional materials, show that the servers have been used inside Department of Defense data centers to process drone and surveillance-camera footage, on Navy warships to transmit feeds of airborne missions, and inside government buildings to enable secure videoconferencing. NASA, both houses of Congress, and the Department of Homeland Security have also been customers. This portfolio made Elemental a target for foreign adversaries.
Supermicro had been an obvious choice to build Elemental’s servers. Headquartered north of San Jose’s airport, up a smoggy stretch of Interstate 880, the company was founded by Charles Liang, a Taiwanese engineer who attended graduate school in Texas and then moved west to start Supermicro with his wife in 1993. Silicon Valley was then embracing outsourcing, forging a pathway from Taiwanese, and later Chinese, factories to American consumers, and Liang added a comforting advantage: Supermicro’s motherboards would be engineered mostly in San Jose, close to the company’s biggest clients, even if the products were manufactured overseas.
Today, Supermicro sells more server motherboards than almost anyone else. It also dominates the $1 billion market for boards used in special-purpose computers, from MRI machines to weapons systems. Its motherboards can be found in made-to-order server setups at banks, hedge funds, cloud computing providers, and web-hosting services, among other places. Supermicro has assembly facilities in California, the Netherlands, and Taiwan, but its motherboards—its core product—are nearly all manufactured by contractors in China.
The company’s pitch to customers hinges on unmatched customization, made possible by hundreds of full-time engineers and a catalog encompassing more than 600 designs. The majority of its workforce in San Jose is Taiwanese or Chinese, and Mandarin is the preferred language, with hanzi filling the whiteboards, according to six former employees. Chinese pastries are delivered every week, and many routine calls are done twice, once for English-only workers and again in Mandarin. The latter are more productive, according to people who’ve been on both. These overseas ties, especially the widespread use of Mandarin, would have made it easier for China to gain an understanding of Supermicro’s operations and potentially to infiltrate the company. (A U.S. official says the government’s probe is still examining whether spies were planted inside Supermicro or other American companies to aid the attack.)
With more than 900 customers in 100 countries by 2015, Supermicro offered inroads to a bountiful collection of sensitive targets. “Think of Supermicro as the Microsoft of the hardware world,” says a former U.S. intelligence official who’s studied Supermicro and its business model. “Attacking Supermicro motherboards is like attacking Windows. It’s like attacking the whole world.”
Well before evidence of the attack surfaced inside the networks of U.S. companies, American intelligence sources were reporting that China’s spies had plans to introduce malicious microchips into the supply chain. The sources weren’t specific, according to a person familiar with the information they provided, and millions of motherboards are shipped into the U.S. annually. But in the first half of 2014, a different person briefed on high-level discussions says, intelligence officials went to the White House with something more concrete: China’s military was preparing to insert the chips into Supermicro motherboards bound for U.S. companies.
The specificity of the information was remarkable, but so were the challenges it posed. Issuing a broad warning to Supermicro’s customers could have crippled the company, a major American hardware maker, and it wasn’t clear from the intelligence whom the operation was targeting or what its ultimate aims were. Plus, without confirmation that anyone had been attacked, the FBI was limited in how it could respond. The White House requested periodic updates as information came in, the person familiar with the discussions says.
Apple made its discovery of suspicious chips inside Supermicro servers around May 2015, after detecting odd network activity and firmware problems, according to a person familiar with the timeline. Two of the senior Apple insiders say the company reported the incident to the FBI but kept details about what it had detected tightly held, even internally. Government investigators were still chasing clues on their own when Amazon made its discovery and gave them access to sabotaged hardware, according to one U.S. official. This created an invaluable opportunity for intelligence agencies and the FBI—by then running a full investigation led by its cyber- and counterintelligence teams—to see what the chips looked like and how they worked.
The chips on Elemental servers were designed to be as inconspicuous as possible, according to one person who saw a detailed report prepared for Amazon by its third-party security contractor, as well as a second person who saw digital photos and X-ray images of the chips incorporated into a later report prepared by Amazon’s security team. Gray or off-white in color, they looked more like signal conditioning couplers, another common motherboard component, than microchips, and so they were unlikely to be detectable without specialized equipment. Depending on the board model, the chips varied slightly in size, suggesting that the attackers had supplied different factories with different batches.
Officials familiar with the investigation say the primary role of implants such as these is to open doors that other attackers can go through. “Hardware attacks are about access,” as one former senior official puts it. In simplified terms, the implants on Supermicro hardware manipulated the core operating instructions that tell the server what to do as data move across a motherboard, two people familiar with the chips’ operation say. This happened at a crucial moment, as small bits of the operating system were being stored in the board’s temporary memory en route to the server’s central processor, the CPU. The implant was placed on the board in a way that allowed it to effectively edit this information queue, injecting its own code or altering the order of the instructions the CPU was meant to follow. Deviously small changes could create disastrous effects.
Since the implants were small, the amount of code they contained was small as well. But they were capable of doing two very important things: telling the device to communicate with one of several anonymous computers elsewhere on the internet that were loaded with more complex code; and preparing the device’s operating system to accept this new code. The illicit chips could do all this because they were connected to the baseboard management controller, a kind of superchip that administrators use to remotely log in to problematic servers, giving them access to the most sensitive code even on machines that have crashed or are turned off.
This system could let the attackers alter how the device functioned, line by line, however they wanted, leaving no one the wiser. To understand the power that would give them, take this hypothetical example: Somewhere in the Linux operating system, which runs in many servers, is code that authorizes a user by verifying a typed password against a stored encrypted one. An implanted chip can alter part of that code so the server won’t check for a password—and presto! A secure machine is open to any and all users. A chip can also steal encryption keys for secure communications, block security updates that would neutralize the attack, and open up new pathways to the internet. Should some anomaly be noticed, it would likely be cast as an unexplained oddity. “The hardware opens whatever door it wants,” says Joe FitzPatrick, founder of Hardware Security Resources LLC, a company that trains cybersecurity professionals in hardware hacking techniques.
U.S. officials had caught China experimenting with hardware tampering before, but they’d never seen anything of this scale and ambition. The security of the global technology supply chain had been compromised, even if consumers and most companies didn’t know it yet. What remained for investigators to learn was how the attackers had so thoroughly infiltrated Supermicro’s production process—and how many doors they’d opened into American targets.
Unlike software-based hacks, hardware manipulation creates a real-world trail. Components leave a wake of shipping manifests and invoices. Boards have serial numbers that trace to specific factories. To track the corrupted chips to their source, U.S. intelligence agencies began following Supermicro’s serpentine supply chain in reverse, a person briefed on evidence gathered during the probe says.
As recently as 2016, according to DigiTimes, a news site specializing in supply chain research, Supermicro had three primary manufacturers constructing its motherboards, two headquartered in Taiwan and one in Shanghai. When such suppliers are choked with big orders, they sometimes parcel out work to subcontractors. In order to get further down the trail, U.S. spy agencies drew on the prodigious tools at their disposal. They sifted through communications intercepts, tapped informants in Taiwan and China, even tracked key individuals through their phones, according to the person briefed on evidence gathered during the probe. Eventually, that person says, they traced the malicious chips to four subcontracting factories that had been building Supermicro motherboards for at least two years.
As the agents monitored interactions among Chinese officials, motherboard manufacturers, and middlemen, they glimpsed how the seeding process worked. In some cases, plant managers were approached by people who claimed to represent Supermicro or who held positions suggesting a connection to the government. The middlemen would request changes to the motherboards’ original designs, initially offering bribes in conjunction with their unusual requests. If that didn’t work, they threatened factory managers with inspections that could shut down their plants. Once arrangements were in place, the middlemen would organize delivery of the chips to the factories.
The investigators concluded that this intricate scheme was the work of a People’s Liberation Army unit specializing in hardware attacks, according to two people briefed on its activities. The existence of this group has never been revealed before, but one official says, “We’ve been tracking these guys for longer than we’d like to admit.” The unit is believed to focus on high-priority targets, including advanced commercial technology and the computers of rival militaries. In past attacks, it targeted the designs for high-performance computer chips and computing systems of large U.S. internet providers.
Provided details of Businessweek’s reporting, China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs sent a statement that said “China is a resolute defender of cybersecurity.” The ministry added that in 2011, China proposed international guarantees on hardware security along with other members of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, a regional security body. The statement concluded, “We hope parties make less gratuitous accusations and suspicions but conduct more constructive talk and collaboration so that we can work together in building a peaceful, safe, open, cooperative and orderly cyberspace.”
The Supermicro attack was on another order entirely from earlier episodes attributed to the PLA. It threatened to have reached a dizzying array of end users, with some vital ones in the mix. Apple, for its part, has used Supermicro hardware in its data centers sporadically for years, but the relationship intensified after 2013, when Apple acquired a startup called Topsy Labs, which created superfast technology for indexing and searching vast troves of internet content. By 2014, the startup was put to work building small data centers in or near major global cities. This project, known internally as Ledbelly, was designed to make the search function for Apple’s voice assistant, Siri, faster, according to the three senior Apple insiders.
Documents seen by Businessweek show that in 2014, Apple planned to order more than 6,000 Supermicro servers for installation in 17 locations, including Amsterdam, Chicago, Hong Kong, Los Angeles, New York, San Jose, Singapore, and Tokyo, plus 4,000 servers for its existing North Carolina and Oregon data centers. Those orders were supposed to double, to 20,000, by 2015. Ledbelly made Apple an important Supermicro customer at the exact same time the PLA was found to be manipulating the vendor’s hardware.
Project delays and early performance problems meant that around 7,000 Supermicro servers were humming in Apple’s network by the time the company’s security team found the added chips. Because Apple didn’t, according to a U.S. official, provide government investigators with access to its facilities or the tampered hardware, the extent of the attack there remained outside their view.
Microchips found on altered motherboards in some cases looked like signal conditioning couplers.
PHOTOGRAPHER: VICTOR PRADO FOR BLOOMBERG BUSINESSWEEK
American investigators eventually figured out who else had been hit. Since the implanted chips were designed to ping anonymous computers on the internet for further instructions, operatives could hack those computers to identify others who’d been affected. Although the investigators couldn’t be sure they’d found every victim, a person familiar with the U.S. probe says they ultimately concluded that the number was almost 30 companies.
That left the question of whom to notify and how. U.S. officials had been warning for years that hardware made by two Chinese telecommunications giants, Huawei Corp. and ZTE Corp., was subject to Chinese government manipulation. (Both Huawei and ZTE have said no such tampering has occurred.) But a similar public alert regarding a U.S. company was out of the question. Instead, officials reached out to a small number of important Supermicro customers. One executive of a large web-hosting company says the message he took away from the exchange was clear: Supermicro’s hardware couldn’t be trusted. “That’s been the nudge to everyone—get that crap out,” the person says.
Amazon, for its part, began acquisition talks with an Elemental competitor, but according to one person familiar with Amazon’s deliberations, it reversed course in the summer of 2015 after learning that Elemental’s board was nearing a deal with another buyer. Amazon announced its acquisition of Elemental in September 2015, in a transaction whose value one person familiar with the deal places at $350 million. Multiple sources say that Amazon intended to move Elemental’s software to AWS’s cloud, whose chips, motherboards, and servers are typically designed in-house and built by factories that Amazon contracts from directly.
A notable exception was AWS’s data centers inside China, which were filled with Supermicro-built servers, according to two people with knowledge of AWS’s operations there. Mindful of the Elemental findings, Amazon’s security team conducted its own investigation into AWS’s Beijing facilities and found altered motherboards there as well, including more sophisticated designs than they’d previously encountered. In one case, the malicious chips were thin enough that they’d been embedded between the layers of fiberglass onto which the other components were attached, according to one person who saw pictures of the chips. That generation of chips was smaller than a sharpened pencil tip, the person says. (Amazon denies that AWS knew of servers found in China containing malicious chips.)
China has long been known to monitor banks, manufacturers, and ordinary citizens on its own soil, and the main customers of AWS’s China cloud were domestic companies or foreign entities with operations there. Still, the fact that the country appeared to be conducting those operations inside Amazon’s cloud presented the company with a Gordian knot. Its security team determined that it would be difficult to quietly remove the equipment and that, even if they could devise a way, doing so would alert the attackers that the chips had been found, according to a person familiar with the company’s probe. Instead, the team developed a method of monitoring the chips. In the ensuing months, they detected brief check-in communications between the attackers and the sabotaged servers but didn’t see any attempts to remove data. That likely meant either that the attackers were saving the chips for a later operation or that they’d infiltrated other parts of the network before the monitoring began. Neither possibility was reassuring.
When in 2016 the Chinese government was about to pass a new cybersecurity law—seen by many outside the country as a pretext to give authorities wider access to sensitive data—Amazon decided to act, the person familiar with the company’s probe says. In August it transferred operational control of its Beijing data center to its local partner, Beijing Sinnet, a move the companies said was needed to comply with the incoming law. The following November, Amazon sold the entire infrastructure to Beijing Sinnet for about $300 million. The person familiar with Amazon’s probe casts the sale as a choice to “hack off the diseased limb.”
As for Apple, one of the three senior insiders says that in the summer of 2015, a few weeks after it identified the malicious chips, the company started removing all Supermicro servers from its data centers, a process Apple referred to internally as “going to zero.” Every Supermicro server, all 7,000 or so, was replaced in a matter of weeks, the senior insider says. (Apple denies that any servers were removed.) In 2016, Apple informed Supermicro that it was severing their relationship entirely—a decision a spokesman for Apple ascribed in response to Businessweek’s questions to an unrelated and relatively minor security incident.
That August, Supermicro’s CEO, Liang, revealed that the company had lost two major customers. Although he didn’t name them, one was later identified in news reports as Apple. He blamed competition, but his explanation was vague. “When customers asked for lower price, our people did not respond quickly enough,” he said on a conference call with analysts. Hayes, the Supermicro spokesman, says the company has never been notified of the existence of malicious chips on its motherboards by either customers or U.S. law enforcement.
Concurrent with the illicit chips’ discovery in 2015 and the unfolding investigation, Supermicro has been plagued by an accounting problem, which the company characterizes as an issue related to the timing of certain revenue recognition. After missing two deadlines to file quarterly and annual reports required by regulators, Supermicro was delisted from the Nasdaq on Aug. 23 of this year. It marked an extraordinary stumble for a company whose annual revenue had risen sharply in the previous four years, from a reported $1.5 billion in 2014 to a projected $3.2 billion this year.
One Friday in late September 2015, President Barack Obama and Chinese President Xi Jinping appeared together at the White House for an hourlong press conference headlined by a landmark deal on cybersecurity. After months of negotiations, the U.S. had extracted from China a grand promise: It would no longer support the theft by hackers of U.S. intellectual property to benefit Chinese companies. Left out of those pronouncements, according to a person familiar with discussions among senior officials across the U.S. government, was the White House’s deep concern that China was willing to offer this concession because it was already developing far more advanced and surreptitious forms of hacking founded on its near monopoly of the technology supply chain.
In the weeks after the agreement was announced, the U.S. government quietly raised the alarm with several dozen tech executives and investors at a small, invite-only meeting in McLean, Va., organized by the Pentagon. According to someone who was present, Defense Department officials briefed the technologists on a recent attack and asked them to think about creating commercial products that could detect hardware implants. Attendees weren’t told the name of the hardware maker involved, but it was clear to at least some in the room that it was Supermicro, the person says.
The problem under discussion wasn’t just technological. It spoke to decisions made decades ago to send advanced production work to Southeast Asia. In the intervening years, low-cost Chinese manufacturing had come to underpin the business models of many of America’s largest technology companies. Early on, Apple, for instance, made many of its most sophisticated electronics domestically. Then in 1992, it closed a state-of-the-art plant for motherboard and computer assembly in Fremont, Calif., and sent much of that work overseas.
Over the decades, the security of the supply chain became an article of faith despite repeated warnings by Western officials. A belief formed that China was unlikely to jeopardize its position as workshop to the world by letting its spies meddle in its factories. That left the decision about where to build commercial systems resting largely on where capacity was greatest and cheapest. “You end up with a classic Satan’s bargain,” one former U.S. official says. “You can have less supply than you want and guarantee it’s secure, or you can have the supply you need, but there will be risk. Every organization has accepted the second proposition.”
In the three years since the briefing in McLean, no commercially viable way to detect attacks like the one on Supermicro’s motherboards has emerged—or has looked likely to emerge. Few companies have the resources of Apple and Amazon, and it took some luck even for them to spot the problem. “This stuff is at the cutting edge of the cutting edge, and there is no easy technological solution,” one of the people present in McLean says. “You have to invest in things that the world wants. You cannot invest in things that the world is not ready to accept yet.”
Bloomberg LP has been a Supermicro customer. According to a Bloomberg LP spokesperson, the company has found no evidence to suggest that it has been affected by the hardware issues raised in the article.
